Talk:Soviet destroyer Shaumyan/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Giving a look. —Ed!(talk) 03:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    Pass External links, dup links and dab links look good. Copyvio detector returns green.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass offline references accepted in good faith, with a cursory look on Google finding generally backing up what's written.
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Suggestions
    • Nothing on 1935-1941 history or location when with the Black Sea fleet?
    • Some further explanation needed on "priorities": "The gun was installed on the new Gnevny-class destroyers but not on Shaumyan due to its weight and the priorities of the Soviet Navy."
    • Strange some engagement have exact numbers of shells fired but much of the early history doesn't. Are the records just generally inconsistent on the Russian post-Barbarossa history?
    • Re: evacuations: Any idea how many soldiers she ferried to safety?
    • Would think the unit cost could see the addition of a {{inflation}} but that's generally up to user preference.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    • Pass No problems there.
  5. It is stable:
    • Pass No problems there.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass Image tagged PD as appropriate.
  7. Other:
    Pass Leaving some suggestions but seeing nothing substantial enough to hold the article up. Thanks as always! —Ed!(talk) 01:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply