Talk:Southworth House (Cleveland, Ohio)/Archive 1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Archive 1

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Southworth House (Cleveland, Ohio). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

The article meets Good Article criteria for the following reasons:

  • Per WP:V, the article has reliable sources.
  • Per WP:NPOV, the article's prose is presented from a neutral point of view.
  • Clearly written, in good prose with correct spelling and grammar.


I would, however, suggest that more images be added to the article. Keep in mind:

  1. (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[1]


Great job improving the article thus far; we need more "short" articles such as this. Congratulations. United Statesman (talk) 00:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  1. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement for Good articles. However, if images (including other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.