Talk:Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed edit
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20080221030408/http://psweb.swufe.edu.cn/~english/his/title.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 04:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Poorly sourced promotional tone edit
This article has too much promotional content. The section on "International partner institutions" is massively bloated, and WP:UNDUE weight. Listing so many organizations without any context or nuance also violates WP:NOT. The use of flag icons further exaggerates the significance of these arrangements, which are common among many, many schools. The section is unsupported by any WP:SECONDARY sources, which would establish context or relevance. Considering the article's past history of copyright violations and promotional additions, the recent activity of a handful of WP:SPA accounts is clear indications of a conflict of interest. Grayfell (talk) 03:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)