Talk:Southpole (clothing)
Latest comment: 6 months ago by 172.59.105.86 in topic Subject is quality
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | On 23 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Southpole. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 23 May 2022 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Southpole itself will also be redirected to the disambiguation page instead of South Pole. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Southpole (clothing) → Southpole – Per WP:CONCISE and WP:SMALLDETAILS. The South Pole is not known in any reliable sources as "Southpole", and no article at South Pole (disambiguation) uses this one-word spelling. As the only exact match, the clothing company's article can be moved to the main title. 162 etc. (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose though I'd support redirecting to the DAB, South Pole Group seems to be "Southpole" at least sometimes and its URL comes up in Google and it gets slightly more views (669) than this one (660)[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support – A case where WP:SMALLDETAILS allows us to avoid parenthetical disambiguation. I don't think there's a need to disambiguate from South Pole Group, personally; in my own Googling, I found that South Pole Group is described as SouthPole (no space but capital P) by one specific publication ([2], [3]), and as South Pole (space and capital P) in every other source I was able to find. That said, a hatnote could still be useful. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose BUT I'd Support redirecting to the dab page South Pole (disambiguation) , per User:Crouch, Swale above. Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose retarget "southpole" to the disambiguation page per Michael Faraday using "Southpole" to refer to such on a magnet. [4] -- 65.92.247.17 (talk) 05:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose In this case it is a believable typo for South Pole so WP:SMALLDETAILS do not apply. Should be targeted to South Pole (disambiguation) instead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, a reasonable and the current redirect to the South Pole but maybe better at an disamb. page (nominator has a lot of trust in the current educational systems and literacy levels of the world). Related: Northpole directs to North Pole. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Subject is quality edit
Description is your quality of Winter Coats good? 172.59.105.86 (talk) 06:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)