 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Southern right whale appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Untitled edit
Is this the same as the "Southern Wright Whale"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aetheogamous (talk • contribs) 20:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 | The Southern right whale article is part of the Cetaceans WikiProject. A discussion on the capitalisation of common names of cetaceans is taking place and your input is appreciated. Please see the the project talk page for the full rationale and comments. |
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bowhead Whale which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 02:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Work needed edit
The fact that the three right whale species are so similar implies that most of the info in them should be the same. Should we factor the common info into the genus article? for instance, that article already has the bowhead as a right whale.
NZ population estimate is grossly wrong edit
202.160.49.20 (talk) 03:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)The article states: "Population estimates in New Zealand waters has risen from 16,000 to 22,000-32,000[18], a record high".
This figure is about three orders of magnitude too high and appears to be a misquotation from the Otago Daily Times article, which referred to historic numbers in the Southern Ocean.
Conservation status symbol things. edit
Wait a second, the stuff mentioned under Conservation and the Conservation status symbols do not match. Either one is out-dated or someone's been messing with it, the symbol says it is in the "Least Concern" category while the article says it should be endangered. Can someone take a look at this? - 120.136.5.36 (talk) 07:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Archaeological evidence from Spain edit
An interesting article just published: Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban (2014). "Occurrence of whale barnacles in Nerja Cave (Málaga, southern Spain): Indirect evidence of whale consumption by humans in the Upper Magdalenian". Quaternary International. 337: 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.01.014..
In short, barnacles from a species which is currently only found on the southern right whale have been identified in a Spanish cave, dating to ~14,000 years ago; this was near the end of the last glacial period, and the authors suggest that this may be the result of changes to ocean circulation cooling the waters around the Equator and allowing the southern populations to drift north. (They also note the alternative that an individual simply got lost!) Perhaps worth mentioning in passing in the distribution section - are there any other known cases of a southern right outside of the normal range? Andrew Gray (talk) 15:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
"Real whale rider" edit
I commented out the following section because the only source was an undocumented Facebook photo: Legends of the Whale Rider are renowned in New Zealand, and real riders can be seen occasionally [1]. Galant Khan (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- I removed the entire paragraph (below), because it is pure original research.
All species of right whales are curious, playful, and very gentle to other species including humans, sometimes actively trying to give swimmers or kayaks a ride on their backs. Legends of the Whale Rider are renowned in New Zealand. In water, they are known to avoid harming swimmers.
- It is completely irresponsible to portray whales as "playful" and "trying to give rides on their backs". No, they are feeding, and for a swimmer or kayaker to try to get "rides" amounts to nothing more than harassment of these animals. I personally knew a man who was killed when a surfacing whale capsized his kayak [2]. Granted, in that specific instance, it was not a right whale, but any species of whale can kill a person in this way. Encouragement of this behavior has no place in an encyclopedia.
- —grolltech(talk) 04:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I removed the entire paragraph (below), because it is pure original research.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Southern right whale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081016165721/http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/conservation/marine-and-coastal/fiordlandcoastalnewsletter-oct07.pdf to http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/conservation/marine-and-coastal/fiordlandcoastalnewsletter-oct07.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611112003/http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/Appendices_COP9_E.pdf to http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/Appendices_COP9_E.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Southern right whale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to ftp://swfscftp.noaa.gov/users/bhhanser/Papers%20included%20in%20table%20of%20Genetics%20working%20paper/Rosenbaum%20HC%20et%20al%202000%20right%20whale%20species.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312092042/http://www.graysreef.nos.noaa.gov/rtwh/rwmay98.html to http://www.graysreef.nos.noaa.gov/rtwh/rwmay98.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217121239/http://www.sun.com.na/content/agri/southern-right-whale-right-whale-protect to http://www.sun.com.na/content/agri/southern-right-whale-right-whale-protect
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to https://events.iwc.int/index.php/scientific/SC65a/paper/view/307/282/SC-65a-Forinfo22. - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140505213903/http://iwcoffice.co.uk/_documents/sci_com/workshops/SRW/S11-RW30.pdf to http://iwcoffice.co.uk/_documents/sci_com/workshops/SRW/S11-RW30.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402135647/http://www.ballenaazul.cl/q_somos.php to http://www.ballenaazul.cl/q_somos.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311071336/http://www.svfalcongt.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-Kermadec-Whale-Project1.pdf to http://www.svfalcongt.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-Kermadec-Whale-Project1.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150304202223/http://www.oceanalliance.org/ to http://www.oceanalliance.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Right edit
Does the 'right' stay for direction or like we say 'true'? Punëtori' Rregullt 06:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- They were called "right" whales by whalers because they continued to float after being killed, making them easier to process for their oil. Bahudhara (talk) 04:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- You're just repeating what secondary sources have said. We don't know why they're called that. It's all just speculation. BulbousCow (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Here's an interesting article from the Nantucket Historical Association that may illuminate the question: The Right Whale…but Wrong Story. Eric talk 18:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've read Dolin's book. He's just repeating someone's opinion as well. My original statement still stands. BulbousCow (talk) 16:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Here's an interesting article from the Nantucket Historical Association that may illuminate the question: The Right Whale…but Wrong Story. Eric talk 18:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- You're just repeating what secondary sources have said. We don't know why they're called that. It's all just speculation. BulbousCow (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)