Talk:Southern Taiwan Science Park

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge discussion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm proposing merging Tainan Science Park and Kaohsiung Science Park into this article, since the Southern Taiwan Science Park includes the two (sub)parks and some info is being duplicated as a result of having separate articles. The information is spread too thin, in my opinion. If in the future, the two parks have enough information to separate into another article, then I would be fine with that, but for now, I don't think it warrants three separate articles to cover this information. As reference, the Chinese version of this article does not have the parks separated. Thoughts? Thanks! -Multivariable (talk) 07:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Neutral. I agree with your assertion that there's not enough right now, but I assume there will be in the future. The Chinese Wikipedia article (singular) appears to anticipate eventually expansion and division into four secondary articles, and I think that will be justified if there is sufficient information. --Nlu (talk) 14:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic