This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The contents of the Zomia page were merged into Southeast Asian Massif on 10 August 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
The regions Southeast Asian Massif and Zomia (region) greatly overlap and are conceptually similar, perhaps reflecting different names for a similar idea. Given the similarity, I suggest that they should be merge to the older term, which also happens to be more comprehensible in English. Klbrain (talk) 22:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support merge. Just need someone to carry it out. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Khumpita: I note that you've removed the merge template from one of the page (Zomia (region)), without discussing it here first. I don't feel strongly about this proposal, but it's good form to discuss it here, particularly when the re are two arguments in support and no opposition. You're argument in the edit note is "I think that the term Zomia should remain even if to merge the two article becuase it is native to the region and also represents the region". I can't quite see how this is a reason for opposing the merge. Links and searches for Zomia (region) will still work, redirect to Southeast Asian Massif where the Zomia will also be discussion. The merge will avoid unnecessary duplication. Klbrain (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Given no objections here, YMerger complete.Klbrain (talk) 07:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
just FYI, this merge is going to alarm quite a few people (most like me are probably not very familiar with Wikipedia merging practices, or continuous editing, etc... clearly I need to educate myself!). The 'Zomia' term is now quite an important concept in academic research, and I suspect a dedicated page will need to be recreated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mheneise (talk • contribs) 09:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hopefully a dedicated section will suffice for now, in the context of the broader regional page. If it grows large enough is can always be SPLIT. Klbrain (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 07:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
