Talk:South Carolina Democratic Party
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POTUS Election results
editI'm considering removing the Presidential election results section as I question the relevance of it for this article. Any thoughts as to why it should remain? Bob Aubin (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Illinois State University supported by WikiProject Politics and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page. |
Keep an eye on the page... The SC Dem party themselves are editing it. It's been pretty benign so far, however. [1] [2] [3] [4]
$ whois 66.35.175.26 ITC^Deltacom ITCD-2 (NET-66-35-128-0-1) 66.35.128.0 - 66.35.191.255 Democratic Party of South Carolina ITCD-66-35-175-24 (NET-66-35-175-24-1) 66.35.175.24 - 66.35.175.31
Recent Vandalism
editSeriously people, if you're going to vandalize the page, be clever about it at the very least. It makes it more fun to revert it. Kearby 04:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree, reading comments about godless bears is more fun than seeing another Colbert '08! Whitesoxfanatic 04:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I've gone and spoiled all the fun. I just protected the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm just so sad... down with the SC Dems —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.194.110 (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just the same, the controversies need to be in the article. Wikilost 04:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ugh, I'm so torn. i wish they'd let Stephen run but... Must .... Not... Vandalize.... Wikilost 05:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just the same, the controversies need to be in the article. Wikilost 04:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)