Talk:South Australian House of Assembly

Gah, seems I havent got the use of tables yet :) Can someone please correct the current distribution of seats table for me, the Libs have 15 seats, not 14. I tried to correct it... but yeah, didn't work as I'd hoped. Timeshift 11:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Done. After adding the "blue square", you needed to delete an empty column. Rocksong 12:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Deleted Biography Websites

I have deleted Biography Websites Page not found notice. Kathleen.wright5 15:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Structure

The structure I am proposing is the only one available. Apparently I need consensus to add it. If you've got a better structure, please, show it. But since there isn't one, the one I am proposing should be used. Andreas11213 (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm opposed to the new image unless the following additions are made.

1) I believe the structure should represent the shape of the chamber.

2) The speaker should be separate.

3) The cross bench should be placed on the cross bench. Not off to one side.

Without these changes I oppose any new image. Especially one you're proposing.The Tepes (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Well if you want it, you make it, but the one I am proposing is the only one available so I think it should be added. Andreas11213 (talk) 05:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Why should I make one? I'm fine with the page as it is. If you want my support to have the image added then make the changes I recommended. Without them my position is maintain the page as is.The Tepes (talk) 06:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

I was actually all ready to jump in and support inclusion of the image on this one, but then I looked at the image itself, and, uh. It needs some work. First of all, yes, the Speaker needs to be separate. Secondly, the crossbench should be, you know, on the crossbenches, not shunted off to the side. Thirdly, there should be two vacant seats (Davenport and Fisher). Once these changes are made, I would be fully prepared to support inclusion, barring any objections I have missed. Frickeg (talk) 07:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

If an image were to be added, it should look like this... and... y'know... actually have the correct numbers? Timeshift (talk) 00:48, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Ugh, no. That image is so ugly, not to mention not at all representing the actual shape of the chamber. But yes, the correct numbers would be great. Frickeg (talk) 01:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Again reverted. It should be like Australian House of Representatives. Timeshift (talk) 01:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I replaced my image, this article needs a diagram and if nobody is going to make a better one I propose mine should be used - it looks similar to the actual chamber and conveys the information in an easy to understand way. Again, if someone wants to actually create an image instead of just talking about it, then go ahead, but don't just be destructive without reason. Thanks :) Hshook (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)