Talk:South American coati

A fact from South American coati appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 0 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that South American Coati males were originally considered a separate species from females due to different social habits?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/July.

Wikipedia

Mammals Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Argentina / Bolivia / Colombia / Ecuador / Guyana / Paraguay / Peru / Suriname / Uruguay / Venezuela Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bolivia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Colombia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ecuador (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Guyana (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Paraguay (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peru (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Suriname (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uruguay (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as Mid-importance).

South American Coati edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I created this page because Nasua nasua was redirecting to "Coatimundi", which is a general article about all coatis of the genus Nasua. This article is specific to the species N. nasua, and is titled based on "Mammal Species of the World". Rlendog (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rlendog - thanks. How big are they? Autochthony asks, 1950z: 16 May 2010. 81.156.52.159 (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The "Brazilian Aardvark" problem edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Just removed the invented name "Brazilian Aardvark". It was a name created by a single person and has spread via circular reporting. It needs to be removed everytime it appears in the article. See the following for more info.

Wikipedia’s ‘Brazilian Aardvark’ Problem: When Lies Turn Into Feedback Loops, disinfo

Dger (talk) 23:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Since its invented name has appeared in reputable sources, though, even though it's fraudulent, isn't the *hoax* surrounding the name, notable? --Special:Contributions/TheSands-12 01:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSands-12 (talk • contribs) Reply

Having something about this in the article itself could help break the feedback loop more than simply removing it DogsRNice (talk) 20:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic