Talk:Source Filmmaker
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move (2012) edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Source Filmmaker (software) → Source Filmmaker – The target page is a redirect leading to this one. And seeing as there's no other Source Filmmaker articles, specificity isn't an issue. Honestly, there's really no reason not to. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, the only reason I made the title longer was because the original redirect linked right back to the Source engine page section of the same name. :/ —017Bluefield (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, go ahead. No harm done. —017Bluefield (talk)
- I'd like to, but the page refuses to let me due to revisions made to the redirect page. I'm going to need an admin's help. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Post-move edit
Okay, now we've gotta delete the redirect. —017Bluefield (talk) 23:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
SFM in Video games category? edit
I know it works inside the Source game engine, but does that really make the SFM a video game? According to the Steam website, it's under the Software category. —017Bluefield (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Community-made films section edit
The list of community-made films is incomplete; there are much, much more than that. We would either have to somehow update the list every time a new film is made, only list the notable films (award-winning, featured), or just delete the section completely. Goatcheese3 (talk) 11:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Option #2: Notable (usually, as you said, "featured" in SourceFilmMaker's Community Spotlight playlist). -017Bluefield (talk) 18:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Does not sound like an ad edit
I don't find it sounds particularly like an ad, it sounds like a comprehensive overview of the software. If anyone could point out which parts sound like an ad, that would be great. If not, I'm deleting the part from the improvement needed box. MarinaTheRanger (talk) 19:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)