Talk:Sound energy flux
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Sound energy flux page were merged into Sound power on 28 Mar 2015 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Vandalism
editwateva i really dont know that wat r u talking about..........i also agree This page has probably been subject to vandalism. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I'd mark this page for deletion and link it to sound intensity but I don't know how :) sorry!
- I agree. Adamd1008 (talk) 23:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Edit: I've undone the vandalism. Adamd1008 (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
okay this website means nothing at all to me
get more informatoin okay this is like a load of crap —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.186.167.253 (talk) 07:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
hi this is emily —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.230.206 (talk) 00:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sound energy flux/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| If sound energy flux is energy rate flow referenced to one period then why it is not called sound power flux? Tolima |
Last edited at 15:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)