Talk:SooperDooperLooper/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Newtothisedit (talk · contribs) 02:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this --Newtothisedit (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

1. Is it well written

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Comments

• For the caption of one image it says "SooperDooperLooper's train" and the other it says "SooperDooperLooper's train" I would change this so they have the same wording
• Add the year when a date is within a new month Ex: "Work began on the project site on October 29" to "Work began on the project site on October 29 1976"
• "The roller coaster's iconic vertical loop was finished" This use of iconic could be seen as peacock language. I would change this sentence to "The roller coaster's vertical loop was finished"
• "A 150-foot (46-meter) tunnel was added to part of the roller coaster for the 1979 season which would feature lights and sounds" change to "A 150-foot (46-meter) tunnel featuring lights and sounds was added to the roller coaster for the 1979 season."
• "The roller coaster necessitated around 500 tons" to "The roller coaster needed around 500 tons"

That's all I have--Newtothisedit (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

@Newtothisedit: Appreciate another review; all suggestions have been fulfilled from above. Let me know if there's anything else you spot! :D Adog (Talk・Cont) 03:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Looks good, passing it. Newtothisedit (talk) 03:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)