Talk:Somerton, Somerset/Archive 2
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
GA
You'll need a lot more references for it to pass. Look at these GA articles for help.--andreasegde (talk) 14:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll try referencing the article up before the GA review is taken. Jaguar (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've just found this has been nominated. I feel most of the claims made in the article are appropriately referenced, however I wonder if the Lead needs to be expended to more completely summarise the article?— Rod talk 11:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have expanded and cleaned up the lead a little bit although I think it needs expanding a bit more. I will look onto it. Regards Jaguar (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. The article is also lacking Economy and Demography sections as recommended by WP:UKCITIES. Some reviewers will also prefer short (1 or 2 sentence) paragraphs to be combined. Refs 5 & 6 are missing page numbers & ref 27 needs a publisher & accessdate etc.— Rod talk 12:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I happened to be in a library today so have added the page numbers etc for the refs highlighted.— Rod talk 15:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've done a bit more tidying of the references but I'm worried about Ref 22 which is about a parish council meeting relating to a parish in Norfolk rather than one in Somerset & Ref 21 which is about a village in Oxfordshire. I'm unsure if it can be used to support the claims in the governance section of this article.— Rod talk 16:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll see if I can fix those two refs you mentioned and in the mean time I can give the article a full copy edit (including merging some 1 or sentences together) and adding more references before the GA review gets undertaken. Jaguar (talk) 17:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've done a bit more tidying of the references but I'm worried about Ref 22 which is about a parish council meeting relating to a parish in Norfolk rather than one in Somerset & Ref 21 which is about a village in Oxfordshire. I'm unsure if it can be used to support the claims in the governance section of this article.— Rod talk 16:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- I happened to be in a library today so have added the page numbers etc for the refs highlighted.— Rod talk 15:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. The article is also lacking Economy and Demography sections as recommended by WP:UKCITIES. Some reviewers will also prefer short (1 or 2 sentence) paragraphs to be combined. Refs 5 & 6 are missing page numbers & ref 27 needs a publisher & accessdate etc.— Rod talk 12:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have expanded and cleaned up the lead a little bit although I think it needs expanding a bit more. I will look onto it. Regards Jaguar (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've just found this has been nominated. I feel most of the claims made in the article are appropriately referenced, however I wonder if the Lead needs to be expended to more completely summarise the article?— Rod talk 11:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)