Talk:Somerset Coalfield/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Gilderien in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 17:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


From a first read through, seems a good article, good use of images, which are all appropriately licensed. However, there were a few minor points;


  • Ideally the lead should not contain material not listed elsewhere, nor have citations - could you move/copy the sentence regarding the toal area of the coalfield to another appropriate place within the article?
  • Reference 7 is a dead link, as are references 8, 9, 58, 62, 67, 77, 78, and 81.
  • Reference 2 may cover all of the "Structure" sub-section, but this needs to be made clear, or an alternative source found.
  • Similar for the "Stratigraphy".
  • The first paragraph of the "Area Today" section has no reference.
  • The first paragraph of the "Paulton Basin" section has no reference.
  • The first paragraph of the "East of Camerton" section has no reference.
  • The first paragraph of the "Writhlington Collieries" section needs to have more references - as above, this may just be repeating the one at the end of the paragraph.


--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 17:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks for the comments. It is amazing how quickly deadlinks creep in as I checked all of these a couple of months ago when I nominated it. I hope I've addressed the queries, but if there is anything else you think is needed please let me know.— Rod talk 19:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


So that is about it. Congratulations.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply