Talk:Someone like You (TV series)

(Redirected from Talk:Someone Like You (TV series))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Synoman Barris in topic Requested move 23 August 2020

Bad ISBN

edit

Because they are causing a Checkwiki error #70: "ISBN with wrong length", I removed the ISBN from these entries:

  • 2 April 2015 : S-Pop Vol. 26 April 2015 (華流 4月號/2015第26期) - ISBN 471709558780904 - Author: Sanlih E-Television 三立電視監製
  • 3 May 2015 : S-Pop Vol. 27 May 2015 (華流 5月號/2015第27期) - ISBN 4712931280593 - Author: Sanlih E-Television 三立電視監製

I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBNs on the Internet; the same "471" ISBNs appear everywhere. A valid ISBN begins with "978" or "979". In the case of S-Pop, it is a periodical, so an ISSN is more appropriate. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 03:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 August 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved(non-admin closure) Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply



– per Talk:Someone like You (Adele song)#Capitalisation of "like" St3095 (?) 06:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Relisting. ~SS49~ {talk} 07:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose The cited guideline, MOS:CT, indicates that the word like's capitalization should be based on its usage in a significant majority or reliable, independent sources. And the significant majority use the current capitalization -- indeed, it is difficult to find many using the proposed one. Therefore, per MOS:CT, our guidelines indicate this should not be moved.--Yaksar (let's chat) 13:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Outside of that specific policy -- our overall, topline policy for capitalization in the intro of MOS:CAPS is clear: "Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalized; only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia." To do this would be to do literally the opposite of what the overarching goal of this guideline tells us.--Yaksar (let's chat) 13:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.