Talk:Somebody Told Me
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasn't this song written and performed earlier than by The Killers? I swear to have heard this song years before, and when I first heard the killers do it, I knew the words and music. I also recall hearing a different version since The Killers did it.
Can this be cleared up?
- I've never heard it before the Killers played it. They released multiple versions, a couple remixes so maybe that caused confusion. Salty!Talk! 21:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I knew the lyrics to this song when I first heard it, too. I swear this has to be a cover of an older song -- if not, the entire song, then at least some of it. Anybody else? 72.194.223.23 07:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Troy
I don't know if this helps, but the song is clearly being played on an episode of Beverly Hills 90210 Season 2 (Pass, Not Pass) when Bradon is driving he car after just aving boought it. The lyrics are different but the tune sounds identical to me and I guess this episode is from 1991. Don't know what the song is though. -Ade
"The lyrics refer to rumours that can spoil your night ("never thought I'd let a rumor ruin my moonlight"). In this case, it's concerning a girl that has a new boyfriend who looks like a girlfriend the narrator had last year."
- Isn't this a bit redundant? And I thought that the singer mentioned that the "rumor" in this case refers to his girlfriend becoming a lesbian...
Lyrics
editSo what is the story with the lyrics? The core lines are:
Somebody told me
You had a boyfriend
Who looks like the girlfriend
I had in February of last year
It's not confidential
I've got potential...
which could mean that
- The person in question is actually female, revealing the person being addressed as lesbian or bisexual
- The person in question is actually male, revealing the narrator as gay or bisexual
- It's the same person in different roles, i.e., a transgendered person
Ideas? --216.240.39.14 04:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
You're confusing this.
The narrator is male. He had a girlfriend he had the February of last year. Still with me? The narrator has a friend that has a boyfriend. The boyfriend looks like his girlfriend.
The problem you're having is that you're thinking that the boyfriend in question is the girlfriend. Maybe the guy just looks like a girl?
Or maybe because it sounds catchy. I mean, it does. Zero R 08:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Dude, are you kidding me? The song is obviously about androgyny and, most likely, bisexuality. I'm stunned that somebody could seriously misinterpret the lyrics like you have. Random Person 11:10PST, 23 May 2007
Why would it be a big deal and "ruin [his] moonlight" if it was to be taken at face value? I see this as him having 2 exes who are now dating, thus feeling he turned 2 girls lesbian, and denying it to himself, not wanting to give it truth, so telling himself it's just a boy who LOOKS like a girl. 71.71.53.70 23:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't have a reference for it, but I have heard, and this discussion here confirms it, that there are varying interpretations of the lyrics. If someone has a reference for this, or a reference for one of the band members stating the meaning it would add a lot to this article. And the line "I've got potential" makes me inclined to interpret it to mean that the narrator is gay or bi, although I originally thought it was about two of his ex-girlfriends being a lesbian couple. IsaacSapphire 03:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, my college English group was analysing this song today (along with "Mr. Brightside" - yes, my course rocks), and we figured it was about bisexuality and/or androgyny. Especially if you read it and "Mr. Brightside" together - you can interpret "Mr. Brightside" as recounting a threesome and the jealousy it engendered. Fun times. --Sir Ophiuchus (talk) 14:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Somebody pink.jpg
editImage:Somebody pink.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Somebody Told Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091202050657/http://www.xfm.co.uk/onair/shows/song-of-the-decade-10-1 to http://www.xfm.co.uk/onair/shows/song-of-the-decade-10-1
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120529160917/http://songofthedecade.com/song/The+Killers/Somebody+Told+Me to http://songofthedecade.com/song/The+Killers/Somebody+Told+Me
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:LGBT-related songs
editI'm not sure this category is appropriate here as it appears to me as though there is no clear verifiable information in the article (per WP:CATV) as to why the article is in this category Palmtree5551 (talk) 06:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- It seems pretty easy to connect it to this category when you hear the lyrics, it's just not all agreed upon or officially verified? The thing with music is that it can allow for tons of different interpretations of something, so it's kinda messy in the first place. Orowith2os (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)