Talk:Somalia at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This looks fine except for one issue, the shortness of the article—or, as far as GAs go, the extreme shortness.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead section is longer than the article body, and contains information not found in the article body (the lead summarizes the below content).

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Compared to, say, Palau at the 2008 Summer Olympics, this (a) has no image (b) describes the events in very little detail, giving an end result only (c) says little outside the very events. How was the athletes chosen? How did the athletes react on the performances, how did others react? I realize that the media coverage of Sierra Leone probably is scarce, but to have nothing is not appropriate either, for the GA level.
   Re: point b, "without going into unnecessary detail", this should go into more detail..

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Is this impossible to illustrate?

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   for now. Geschichte (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

   Nothing has happened, so this fails. Feel free to try again with a reassessment, but the above points should be seen to first. Geschichte (talk) 22:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)