Talk:Solo (Boyd novel)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Solo (Boyd novel)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 20:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I will review this article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

• In the lead, link hardback and ebook
• Why is citation 1 needed in the lead?
• "Boyd modelled his version" This far in the article, you haven't mentioned William Boyd yet, so you should be including his first name there.
• The Boyd image caption doesn't need a period
• "although that was 48% down on Jeffery Deaver's" You've already given Deaver's full name; the "Jeffery" can be omitted
• "before being collected by seven Jensen Interceptors before being" avoid repetition of "before being"

• slight re-phrasing removed both. - SchroCat (talk) 08:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

• In the lead, you say "ebook", in the Release and reception section you say "e-book". Be consistent
• ""far superior to the last effort to breathe life into a Bond novel by Jeffrey Deaver"" Shouldn't this be Jeffery Deaver?

On hold now. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks TT: all your comments dealt with and acted on. Thanks for taking the time and effort to review this: it's much appreciated. - SchroCat (talk) 08:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

No problem, you're very welcome. Happy to list this as a Good Article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

That's great news: thanks very much indeed! - SchroCat (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)