Talk:Solar eclipse of November 22, 1900

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fritzmann2002 talk 13:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created by JPxG (talk). Self-nominated at 22:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Solar eclipse of November 22, 1900; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   Appears to meet all the criteria. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Importance of a small local newspaper misidentifying the country? edit

I'm not sure why we're calling out a small local newspaper's mistake here. Have secondary sources remarked on the error? Ed [talk] [OMT] 15:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I completely agree. Maybe tomorrow or when the "Did You Know?" section changes it can be removed. NotAMoleMan (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Mostly I think it bears at least some mention of why we're (otherwise seemingly arbitrary) ignoring the "Austria" thing in the source. It's just not true that it went over Austria -- it was thousands of miles away -- but the source is otherwise credible as to the details of what went on. Of course, on the other hand, it might be worth just removing the whole citation. It doesn't make a whole gigantic lot of difference to me. jp×g🗯️ 22:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply