Talk:Solar eclipse of July 11, 2010

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

...keep it the way this is..it was like this when it started as an article.

Untitled

edit
references link is broken, sum1 fix it? 222.155.185.145 (talk) 09:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The eclipse has ended; present-tense references are now past tense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.151.4 (talk) 21:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reportedly

edit

It reportedly took place? Is it necessary to qualify the statement in that manner? PurpleChez (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Other eclipses?

edit

Why is there so much info and pictures of other eclipses, when the title of this page is Solar eclipse of July 11, 2010? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 12:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Solar eclipse of July 11, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply