Talk:Soap (song)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by SS49 in topic Requested move 14 May 2020
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 14 May 2020 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 03:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Soap (Melanie Martinez song) → Soap (song) – This is the only song called "Soap" according to the disambiguation page. Popmusicstan101 (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as its listed as Soap (Melanie Martinez song) on the disambiguation page Soap (disambiguation). But a new soap song can come up and we need to keep a scope to include it, although considering WP:CRYSTALBALL policy. ~Amkgp ✉ 18:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support. If another song is identified, we can disambiguate the title when that happens. There is no need to do it preemptively. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per WP:NCSONG and indeed per BarrelProof if another later pops up we can move back. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Amkgp. Also, please note that the proponent of this RM is a sock that is indefinitely blocked. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 11:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support as it appears to be the only song with this title that has an article. If another song with the same title comes out in the future, then this could be discussed again. I agree with BarrelProof on this. Aoba47 (talk) 21:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.