Talk:So Seductive

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
Good articleSo Seductive has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:So Seductive/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox edit

  • No issues

Lead edit

Background edit

Writing and composition edit

Critical reception edit

  • No issues

Music video edit

  • No issues

Live performances edit

  • No issues

Awards and nominations edit

Track listing edit

  • No issues

Credits and personnel edit

  • No issues

Charts edit

  • No issues

Radio and release history edit

  • No issues

References edit

  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are some minor prose issues among others that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status, until a consensus is reached. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 06:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel comfortable passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply