Talk:So Long, London/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 13:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Hi, @Ippantekina! I'll be reviewing this article as soon as possible. I'm a little nervous for a reason that you can see on my user page, but at least I'm being a little more daring LOL. I apologize once and for all for the times I'm going to make you wait because it's very frustrating, because I don't have many days off, but I'll deal with this as quickly as possible. Best, Santi (talk) 19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)