Talk:So It Goes.../GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 17:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

• "An incorporation of → a combination of
• "The BBC asserted that" → It would be helpful to say who wrote the article as this implies that the company as a whole is asserting this
• "a dispute with" redundant
• "; "So It Goes..." being one of them" → ",including "So It Goes"
• "Görres recalled that it was a "strange" session for him because he had just gotten out of the shower wrapped in a towel, but he was "very thankful for that"" → I don't know about this sentence
• "might help her out of her fixations" → specify who "her" is. what fixations?
• "commended" → commented?
• "deemed the song insignificant, but cringe-worthy" → why the use of "but"?
• "also calling it" → also called it
• studios and track length are given in infobox but not body

Heartfox (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

for point 5, it is taken from the source itself. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 00:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

also, the source did not specify what fixations. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 00:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

commended is another word for praise. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 00:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

• As a follow-up, I noticed that Time, Associated Press, NZ Herald, Elite Daily, Bustle refs lack authors. There is also an issue with the Consequence ref formatting. Heartfox (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)