This article looks like a freakin' advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.127.60 (talk) 05:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Very poor. There should be some information about manufacturing, distribution and who uses Smeg. For example, in Australia only Winning Appliances sell Smeg. Smeg on Winning Appliances 125.255.85.74 (talk) 23:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Really, spamming a talk page? KLP (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article oo much UK oriented. Fix desperately needed. (It would be ok if is was US oriented as per most pages????)

No. I don't think you understand. I nominated this article for speedy deletion. If you want it to stay, please explain why you think it qualifies as neither spam nor non-notability. Also, please sign your posts. KLP (talk) 02:06, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Information regarding the fact that Smeg is the largest italian appliance manufacturer is wrong. Indesit company is the largest italian appliance company while Electrolux (Swedish) has the largest italian manufacturing base. 203.15.64.15 06:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Minifridge1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Minifridge1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (legitimate information about company, should be extrapolated and not deleted) --58.169.137.234 (talk) 01:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article is spam. It advertises a non-notable appliance manufacturer without any reliable sources. We should not extrapolate spam. We should delete it. KLP (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

This page should not be speedily deleted because... you are removing wiki facts. Although the article is small, it is valid. --90.203.219.170 (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

If you want it to stay, please explain why you think it qualifies as neither spam nor non-notability. KLP (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

This page should not be deleted because the linked Italian equivalent appears to be well-referenced, including references independent of the subject. Ideally that content would be translated into English, but in the meantime, this is surely enough credible evidence of notability that speedy deletion would not be appropriate. – Smyth\talk 16:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Because requests for speedy deletion may themselves be spam supported by the commercial competitors of whoever. Let it stand as the record of a company's existence with information relevant to anyone researching Italian manufacturing and remove any inaccurate, misleading or otherwise commercial embellishments. --68.199.109.142 (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:SmegOperaCooker.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:SmegOperaCooker.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:SmegOperaCooker.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply