Talk:Smart Living Lab

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Quaenuncabibis in topic COI

Best sources that establish notability

edit

As proposed by @Kvng, I try to list here the best secondary sources:

  1. "Votations cantonales - Les Fribourgeois acceptent un soutien de 25 millions à Bluefactory". Le Matin (in French). 2021-06-13. ISSN 1018-3736. Retrieved 2022-06-20.
  2. "Un laboratoire fribourgeois se dédie à l'habitat du futur". Le Temps (in French). 2016-10-08. ISSN 1423-3967. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
  3. "Le Smart Living Lab avance à Fribourg". Bilan (in French). Retrieved 2021-09-08
  4. "Solar Decathlon: Scores and Standings". www.solardecathlon.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-17.
  5. "This Swiss bridge proves it's possible to reuse concrete". Popular Science. 2021-10-18. Retrieved 2022-01-27.
  6. "Building out of concrete, but without pouring concrete". Innovation Origins. Retrieved 2022-01-27.

Thanks @Kvng! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Quaenuncabibis: it looks like 1, 2 and 3 contain the required significant coverage of the lab. ~Kvng (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

COI

edit

The creator of this article, Quaenuncabibis (talk · contribs), has declared that they've done paid editing for EPFL and Smart Living Lab is closely associated with EPFL so I assume there is a COI here. Please let us know if this is somehow not the case. ~Kvng (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Kvng, this indeed the case as stated by the COI tag above. Thanks again and best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply