Talk:Slovenia at the Olympics

Featured listSlovenia at the Olympics is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on December 9, 2019.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2016Featured list candidatePromoted
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 27 external links on Slovenia at the Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Slovenia at the Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dispute over timeline: Slovenia at the Olympics

edit

Hello, in order to clarify this dispute here, I would like you to explain in detail what exactly you find confusing. This simple snapshot of Slovenian history is by no means irrelevant or unnecessary (as User:Tone claimed) for Olympic history of Slovenia. And to the Olympic history of Slovenia, this timeline is also an insight as an overview-eyecatcher into the consequences for the Olympic history of the successor states for those who are unfamiliar with the topic of the breakup of Yugoslavia. Furthermore, this timeline also avoids the nationalist tendencies of the successor states claiming past successes for themselves alone.
Thanks Miria~01 (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miria~01 (talkcontribs)

I don't see dispute or issues all. The entire history is well-explained both in the intro and in the pre-independence sections. Also, this is a featured list so I'd be highly conservative with unnecessary additions. --Tone 12:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm also in favor of a conservative attitude towards featured lists, but I don't see this as a violation here, but rather as a contribution that adheres to the schemes of featured lists.
However, if the consensus is that it isn't necessary, since this is explained in text form, I won't insist. It was actually just a concern for me for those who were not familiar with the breakup of Yugoslavia to create an overall overview and get through the sports history of the former states of Yugoslavia. - Miria~01 (talk) 13:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I understand your reasoning. But, I believe it is well described in the text, and all cases that could be misinterpreted are explained (for example why Vinko Jelovac is not listed and what was the situation with Jakov Fak, Iztok Puc, and some others.) Thank you for your efforts, though, great team work :) --Tone 16:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply