Talk:Slimane Hadj Abderrahmane

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

explanation

edit

There are some categories for extrajudicial prisoners. So far this category has been used on articles about both current and past prisoners. This is consistent with how other categories on other kinds of prisoners.

There is a contributor who has a recent concern over these categories, and he started unilaterally removing former captives from these categories.

I am reverting this instance.

I am going to urge this contributor to comply with the wikipedia's civility policies, and engage in a civil, meaningful discussion over their concerns. Geo Swan (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please stop falsely accusing your fellow editors. The category was removed based on Wikipedia policy of redundant cats (see WP:SUBCAT). There was no attack made. A policy based reason was given. You revert, with an edit summary of "revert -- see talk". I come to this talk page and all I see is a false attack about being uncivil. Please cut out this nonsense and self-revert.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't see that any civility arguments are necessary, and we should indeed be focused on content. However, I would encourage brewcrewer to seek consensus with Wikiproject:Terrorism or a similar group before unilaterally removing categories - especially ones that seem to generate concerns among established editors. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 05:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Brewcrewer is still hoping that someone would care to explain why Category:People held at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp is not redundant to Category:Guantanamo detainees known to have been released and should not be removed based on WP's WP:SUBCAT policy.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Slimane Hadj Abderrahmane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Slimane Hadj Abderrahmane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply