Talk:Sleipner-class corvette

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Nordic

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Ambiguity edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is some ambiguity in the phrase "It was intended to build 5 ships of the class, but because of economical problems only two were built."

I would rewrite the sentence as either "because of economic problems only two were built" meaning that the Norwegian Navy didn't have the funds to build more, or

"because of economy problems only two were built" in the context of warships this means that the ships were costly to run, using more resources, fuel, manpower etc than expected, these two interpretations are not the same and it needs to be determined which is correct. KTo288 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decommisioning edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While I was doing military service in Ramsund (northern Norway) in 1998 - 1999 one of my duties was to maintain the moorings of one of these. I am not sure which one it was as I cannot remember if any numbers was painted on its side. I do not have any photos from then but recognizes the vessel from the illustration. The last thing I know about that vessel was that it was towed to an anchor location where it was supposed to be used as a target in a shooting practice, probably a target for missiles. As far as I know, all machinery, electronic equipment, weapon systems, and other things of practical or financial value was removed before the tow left Ramsund. --Skippern (talk) 15:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic