This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[History of slavery#Slavery in North America|History of slavery - Slavery in North America]] The anchor (#Slavery in North America) has been deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I have reverted the deletion of the comment about Cartwright's slave possibly being African. I think it is generally acknowledged that we don't now know with any certain what ethnicity the slave had. However, given that many of the common law cases later focussed upon the "infidel" rationale on the basis that slaves were black, I don't think it is inapt to comment on the possibility that Cartwright's slave may also have been black. Conversely, I can't see any reason for commenting on the possibility (whilst acknowledging that it is certainly not a probability - the first serious wave of African slaves did not arrive until the 1700s[1]). --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Legis: It's not really Wikipedia's place to comment on that possibility, unless other sources have already commented on that possibility. I'm not ruling out the Cartwright's slave might have been black (I was aware of Pushkin's ancestor previously), but it does seem a bit WP:SYNTHESIS-y to introduce that with a source. The preceding sentence isn't really sourced either, maybe we just shouldn't say anything about the slave's ethnicity? 106.69.250.123 (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ok, that is fair enough. Sorry, I had thought you had simply deleted without thinking. --Legis (talk - contribs) 14:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The "African slave trade and the common law" section is not quite a verbatim copy-paste from John Baker's book, but is very close to it - for example:
“
The courts at first held that trover would lie for negroes, as if they were chattels, apparently on the ground that they were infidels; but Holt CJ rejected this view, and also denied the possibility of bringing assumpsit on the sale of a negro in England:
”
— Baker, page 475
“
Initially, the courts held that an action for trover would lie for blacks, as if they were chattels, but this was reasoned on the grounds that they were infidels rather than slaves, and lacked the rights enjoyed by Christians; (reasoning which would later find echoes in the U.S. case of Dred Scott v. Sandford 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)) but Judge Holt was to later reject this analysis, and also denied the possibility of bringing an assumpsit on the sale of a negro in England:
”
— This article
I've added the appropriate template to the article. Tevildo (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
What is the meaning of "lie" in the first sentence of both versions? I'd also like to know what those sentences mean. 2602:306:BC65:53A9:34D1:2453:D594:6131 (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
