Talk:Skyler Page
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The fiasco leading to Page being fired
editI think it's noteworthy enough to mention on the page. 24.110.21.168 (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Agree: Yeah, I think that it was mentioned but removed. That fact should surely be included in the article. - Phill24th (talk). 21:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'll repeat the comment in the edit box:
Any mention of the allegations raised against Page cannot be included until a successful conviction against him has been secured and reported by reliable sources, per policy.
Please see the following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive203#Skylor_Page_at_Clarence_.282014_TV_series.29.E2.80.8E
See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Persons_accused_of_crime
Thank you.
- 23W 22:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Further discussion has also been raised here; might want to read it too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Clarence_%282014_TV_series%29#Skyler_Page_Sexual_Harassment
- 23W 22:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Whether or not to include on the Clarence page is debatable, but there is no reason to not include it here. The discussion at BLP involved 2 editors, so it does not count as a consensus. WP:BLP says to consider not including info unless they're convicted. It does not say to not include it. Even if it turns out to not be true, it is still notable because it is the reason why he was fired. The article says "allegedly". It does not say that it is true. JDDJS (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Take a look at WP:BLPCRIME for me. Allegedly is covered under BLPcrime as well.
For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured.
Really, the only important thing is that he's fired. We can't cast aspersions of accuse somebody of 'allegedly' doing a crime due to BLP. Imagine if we did that. "X allegedly robbed a bank" or 'Y allegedly raped a girl'. It's just messy and we should err on the side of caution. Tutelary (talk) 15:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)- It says consider. And I have considered not including. But it makes no sense. Every single source that mentions the firing says it was because of the sexual assault allegations. Without including the allegations, the article is incomplete because it does not explain why he was fired. Can you show me another example of something as relevant and as sourced as this being left out of any article in the past? JDDJS (talk) 01:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- I am going to try to make this very simple. We are not going to say that he allegedly sexually assaulted someone without a conviction or even a criminal charge. What is put on Wikipedia is very influential to the real world and that's why we have BLP. One such example would be Barrack Obama's supposed birth certificate controversy and Zoe Quinn's personal affairs. In any case, that's the other stuff exists argument. There are differentiating circumstances between pages and they have to be evaluated on their measure. In this case, there are several. There was a BLPN discussion where an administrator endorsed the removal of that content, as well as on this page there have been many people who also opposed the content. It is a BLP violation to state someone who's relatively unknown is accused or committed a crime without evidence that is the case. Heck, if you even read the protection log, it's exactly for BLP violations. Tutelary (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- The fact that he is accused of a crime is extremely relevant. Every single recent news about him has been about the accusation. He didn't even have an article before this. But this conversation is going to go nowhere if it's just the two of us. It seems clear that you're not going to change your mind, and I have no shame in admitting that nothing could ever change my mind about the fact this belong in the article. So in order to remove the stalemate, I am going to post about this in the BLP noticeboard, so that more editors will participate. If several editors participate in a discussion (and not just two like last time) I promise to accept whatever consensus is reached, and I hope that you will do the same. JDDJS (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- I am going to try to make this very simple. We are not going to say that he allegedly sexually assaulted someone without a conviction or even a criminal charge. What is put on Wikipedia is very influential to the real world and that's why we have BLP. One such example would be Barrack Obama's supposed birth certificate controversy and Zoe Quinn's personal affairs. In any case, that's the other stuff exists argument. There are differentiating circumstances between pages and they have to be evaluated on their measure. In this case, there are several. There was a BLPN discussion where an administrator endorsed the removal of that content, as well as on this page there have been many people who also opposed the content. It is a BLP violation to state someone who's relatively unknown is accused or committed a crime without evidence that is the case. Heck, if you even read the protection log, it's exactly for BLP violations. Tutelary (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- It says consider. And I have considered not including. But it makes no sense. Every single source that mentions the firing says it was because of the sexual assault allegations. Without including the allegations, the article is incomplete because it does not explain why he was fired. Can you show me another example of something as relevant and as sourced as this being left out of any article in the past? JDDJS (talk) 01:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2014
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The person in the photo is not Skyler Page. His name is Spencer Rothbone who is now in charge of Clarence. Livster493 (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yup, that doesn't look like Page to me. Done. VQuakr (talk) 06:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2016
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It is confirmed that Skyler Paige was fired from the studio for sexually assaulting a storyboard artist for Adventure Time. 99.56.96.36 (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Datbubblegumdoe[talk – contribs] 18:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Skyler Page. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111021143132/http://www.cartoonbrew.com/student/calarts-producers-show-guest-review-by-fran-krause.html to http://www.cartoonbrew.com/student/calarts-producers-show-guest-review-by-fran-krause.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402085918/http://www.skylerdalepage.com/ to http://skylerdalepage.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Skyler Page arrested
editOn December 31, 2022, Skyler Page was arrested for stealing Nerf guns.[1] 173.187.92.49 (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- That doesn't surprise me.. 2601:204:DD81:7B20:3488:B792:C4CE:1E9E (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Lyle Partridge's deadname
editIn the Career section where it says "In June 2014, Emily Partridge, a storyboard artist on Adventure Time that had worked with Page, made a series of tweets alleging that he had sexually assaulted her," can someone replace Lyle's deadname with their current name as well as their old pronouns since they go by they/them pronouns? Thank you. 2601:204:DD81:7B20:3488:B792:C4CE:1E9E (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)