Talk:Sketchnoting

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2019 and 28 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amytangg. Peer reviewers: Satorymae, Nishaa19.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback on article draft

Hi @Amytangg:, It's really nice to see your progress on your article so far. You already got some really good feedback from the others. Their suggestions to include pictures, examples, or a historysection are all really great!

I'll reiterate that it is important to use in-text citations according to Wikipedia's conventions.

Another thing to do is to add your article to relevant categories. Finally, after you publish your article, you might add links to your article on other pages to help readers (and other editors) find it. I'm really excited to see this continue to develop! Groceryheist (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Comment on article evaluation

Hi Amytangg, I have some comments on your article evaluation:

• Good observation about the use of bullet points that weren't skimmable. This does seem like an area for improvement.
• I also thought your observation that a lack of citations may suggest bias was interesting.

Groceryheist (talk) 21:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Satory's peer review

Hi Amytangg,

Your article provides a really good description on what Sketchnoting is, and it also does a good job at staying content neutral. I think having more references would be really useful. I also think having a little background history on how sketchnoting came to be or some early examples of sketchnoting. The structure looks good, but the "Misconceptions" section could use a little more if there is more to be added, but if not I feel like it could be put elsewhere if you decide to add more information!

Satorymae (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review by Nisha

Hey! I thought you did a great job at keeping your article neutral and the "Elements" section of your article is great as it breaks down each element in not long-winded but concise detail. I think it might look neater if you put your citations in a footnote form for each element! The "Misconceptions" section is a little lacking, but I think that's just because you haven't finished it. I think it might also be good to add examples and pictures to the article to make it more appealing. Maybe adding a section about the history of how sketchnoting came to be would also be nice. Overall, it looks like your article is coming along very nicely! Great job! Nishaa19 (talk) 23:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)