Talk:SixtyEight Research

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Proud User in topic Wikipedia is not the place for this article

The references in this article seem ridiculous. The single AppleInsider article can be used as the citation for 90% of the article's claims. I'd almost argue this is eligible for deletion under WP:COMPANY, as the majority of the cited articles that actually mention SixtyEight are rehashings of the AppleInsider article. 2620:0:1000:447C:9029:2750:564D:E322 (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not the place for this article edit

This article is mostly gossip. The only three useful non-gossip-related facts you can get on this company is its name and vauge details on when it was founded and where its headquarters are. There is a place for this, but Wikipedia isn't it. --Proud User (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)Reply