Talk:SixtyEight Research
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Proud User in topic Wikipedia is not the place for this article
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The references in this article seem ridiculous. The single AppleInsider article can be used as the citation for 90% of the article's claims. I'd almost argue this is eligible for deletion under WP:COMPANY, as the majority of the cited articles that actually mention SixtyEight are rehashings of the AppleInsider article. 2620:0:1000:447C:9029:2750:564D:E322 (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the place for this article edit
This article is mostly gossip. The only three useful non-gossip-related facts you can get on this company is its name and vauge details on when it was founded and where its headquarters are. There is a place for this, but Wikipedia isn't it. --Proud User (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)