This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dravidian civilizationsWikipedia:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsTemplate:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsDravidian civilizations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Nvvchar and @Dr. Blofeld: I'm not sure that the image in the article corresponds with the palace, which is said to be in dilapidated condition by the various references. Also, it's unclear from the reference whether the temple is within the palace or on the palace grounds; is this clarified in a another resource? --Rosiestep (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it doesn't exactly look "dilapidated"!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Rosiestep and @Dr. Blofeld:. There are no better sources. I searched for three days. The img was added by another user. I am also not sure so I am removing it. --Nvvchar. 00:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
