Talk:Sinopec

Latest comment: 14 days ago by Czarking0 in topic US Investment

"Largest" company status"

edit

There appears to be some disagreement between this article and the one for Walmart over which is the largest company in the world by revenue. Neither claim has an obvious source cited and I don't trust myself to fix this on my own. Wanted to bring it to someone's attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinsukato (talkcontribs) 15:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

POV

edit

I have re-ordered the article to match the format of other energy company articles, such as that of Royal Dutch Shell, PetroChina, ExxonMobil, and British Petroleum--corporate history first, an economic profile, then a discussion of recent events.

Upon researching the Gabon article using a more recent source, AfricaFiles, I have found that Sinopec has rectified its earlier activities in Loango, and in order to properly note that Sinopec has, in fact, expanded its activities in Gabon and improved its relationship with local environmental organizations and the government, I have edited the 'Sinopec in Africa' section..129.173.136.98 14:10, 12 Jan 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.115.168.245 (talk)

I have returned deleted pars and references to the 'Sinopec in Africa' section, removed by user stephenzhu, and retitled the section to reflect its current content which is now wider than 'criticism of Sinopec' as it covers the recent kidnapping of Sinopec employees.

Feel free to remove my revisions, or change them in any way but I ask that you justify any similar wholesale editing so that I won't come back and revert the changes. All reasonable edits get my support.Xue hanyu 14:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)xue_hanyuReply

Wo this page has been kidnapped by negative POV! Need help immediately! 129.173.136.98 19:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

April 4, 2010

edit

I stumbled across this page when trying to figure out the ownership structure of one of this company's subsidiaries. I don't believe that it maintains a neutral point of view in its history section, as the section mainly discusses what seems to be a single editor's concerns with the the environmental track record of the company. As I am no expert on this company or its organizational history, I will leave it to those better informed to better flesh out the history section. However, I do believe that the information regarding the company's actions in Gabon should at least be moved to the section regarding the company's environmental track record. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.217.3.52 (talk) 19:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WSJ resource

edit
CNOOC Ltd.. 99.190.87.127 (talk) 07:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Politics of the People's Republic of China potential resource

edit

Merge with China Petrochemical Corporation

edit

This page China_Petrochemical_Corporation refers to the same organization. Federicotg (talk) 18:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Further, I propose a merge in accordance with WP:MERGEPROP. China_Petrochemical_Corporation can easily be exmplained in this article without WP:UNDUE or article size issues. Furthermore, there is little encyclopedic value in China_Petrochemical_Corporation as a standalone.

@Amigao, Gog the Mild, and Pete Garret: Merge proposal. Czarking0 (talk) 23:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

If the merge goes through sources like this can be used to fill in details prior to the IPO.[1]Czarking0 (talk) 03:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Sinopec sheds Sudan project". South China Morning Post. 12 October 2000. Retrieved 27 August 2024.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sinopec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sinopec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add History About Ma Yongsheng becoming chairman

edit

Basically a TODO. This should probably include the reshuffling of Zhang Dong and Dai Houliang Czarking0 (talk) 23:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Green Jet Fuel

edit

Removed this from the led as it is undue weight but it may be worth mentioning elsewhere. [1] Czarking0 (talk) 23:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Similar thoughts on this. [2] A third party source should be used and a more comprehensive and up to date picture of their alternative fuel.

Another source I found. Not originally mentioned.[3]

References

  1. ^ "Sinopec company prepares to produce green jet fuel | Biofuels International Magazine". biofuels-news.com. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 2021-10-22.
  2. ^ "Sinopec company prepares to produce green jet fuel | Biofuels International Magazine". biofuels-news.com. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 2021-10-22.
  3. ^ Shaw, Alfie (26 March 2024). "TotalEnergies signs SAFs agreement with Sinopec". Power Technology. Retrieved 27 August 2024.

History Subsections

edit

The division of the history into Africa and the rest of the world is awkward. It clearly has been a struggle point for editors as there are multiple mentions of African events in the rest of the world section. Due the the global nature of oil, the African events often have notable results outside of Africa. For example the Swiss bribery investigations and subsequent lay-offs over bribes in Nigeria. Therefore, I suggest using a single history section or potentially dividing the history into subsidiaries rather than geographic subsections. Czarking0 (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have taken the step of separating domestic and international concerns as that seems more manageable than this system. However the Africa subsection still remains so there is work to be done on this organization Czarking0 (talk) 05:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sri Lanka Oil Refinery

edit

The article talks about plans to build oil refining in Sri Lanka. The info needs to be updated.[1] Czarking0 (talk) 01:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Aizhu, Chen; Jayasinghe, Uditha; Kaushik, Krishn (25 April 2024). "Exclusive: China's Sinopec charts global expansion with refinery in rival India's backyard". Reuters. Retrieved 27 August 2024.

Easy Joy

edit

Sinopec has a non gas related arm. I have not convinced myself if it is notable enough to discuss in the article. Here are some sources if so.[1][2]Czarking0 (talk) 19:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

It has been difficult to find good sources on their domestic activity so pursing Easy Joy may be a good strategy for finding source material. Czarking0 (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Juan, Du (2014-08-09). "Sinopec to mix oil and water at Easy Joy locations". www.chinadaily.com.cn.
  2. ^ "Sinopec Easy Joy and Ethiopian Embassy Sign Strategic Cooperation Agreement to Explore Coffee Trade Market". www.sinopecgroup.com. 2024-01-17. Retrieved 27 August 2024.

History Gap

edit

As the article currently stands there is effectively no history from 2014-2019 so additional sources for that time period would be appreciated. Czarking0 (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Aramco

edit

There are a couple brief mentions of cooperation with Aramco. This should be expanded. Czarking0 (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ominex de Colombia with ONGC

edit

Intentionally left this out as the main RS source I found. Said it was not significant. Czarking0 (talk) 04:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unocol Impact

edit

Obviously this was not directly Sinopec but many of the sources I read indicate that the failed Unocol CNOOP deal had a large impact on the Going Out policy and the M&A strategy of the Chinese National Oil Companies. With this in mind I think it should be mentioned in the beginning of the international section where the article provides background on the M&A strategies. Czarking0 (talk) 05:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Iran

edit

Crazy that there is no info about Iran relations in this article.

Yadavaran

edit

Added info about this project. I think there is still significantly more to tell about the 2015-2023 timeline.

Garmsar

edit

Just noting that this was a deal that occurred and then fell through. Probably not notable.

Neka

edit

"Since 2001 Sinopec has built a huge oil terminal at the Caspian Sea port of Neka" Need info about this.[1]

Tehran

edit

"[Sinopec] has upgraded Iranian refineries at Tehran, Rey and Tabriz" Need info about this[1]

Azadegan oilfield

edit

Just noting this exists[2] Looks like it is mostly CNPC activity. Also looks liek it was not very successful.[3]

Zavareh-Kashan

edit

Sinopec discovered oil here [2]

In January 2001, Sinopec acquired a 50-per cent stake in the Zavareh-Kashan block from the NOIC at the cost of $13 million. However, the Zavareh-Kashan block had already been proved to be futile in the 1950s and again in the 1970s by Iranian and French Companies. It was not about to yield good news for Sinopec either. After investing in $65 million, Sinopec finally abandoned the project (Kong 2010:157)[3]

So other sources disagree

Czarking0 (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ a b "Sinopec to Sign Iran Garmsar Oil Deal Tuesday". en.shana.ir. 19 June 2006.
  2. ^ a b Lee, P (June 2005). "China's Quest for Oil Security: Oil (Wars) in the Pipeline?". Pacific Review. 18 (2): 265–301.
  3. ^ a b Liu, Dong (8 October 2014). "China's Resource Demand and Market Opportunities in the Middle East: Policies and Operations in Iran and Iraq". Perspectives on Global Development and Technology. 13 (5–6): 564–587. doi:10.1163/15691497-12341318.

US Investment

edit

I have a source saying these exist[1]

Czarking0 (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Fuzuo, Wu (2015). "China's Puzzling Energy Diplomacy Toward Iran". Asian Perspective. 39 (1): 47–69.