 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 11, 2022 and November 11, 2023. |
The Numbers don't add up edit
The Guardian source mentions 25B$ for the total of the day's shopping. But another source mentions that it's 4 time bigger than black friday, which would mean it's around 25B$ for Alibaba alone.
Given that the total 2017 revenue of Alibaba is 25B$... there is a huge discrepancy between these numbers.
WTF anyone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soufron (talk • contribs) 11:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Source edit
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/11/china-singles-day-shopping_n_6138468.html ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Singles' Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208064138/http://udn.com/news/story/8969/1304833-1111 to http://udn.com/news/story/8969/1304833-1111
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Information in Wikipedia articles should be cited to reliable third-party sources edit
The section Singles'_Day#Origins contains several un-cited "guesses".
Wikipedia articles cannot contain original research; all information should be cited to reliable third-party sources. (WP:NOR, WP:VERIFY)
Please add such cites for this information or remove it.
Thank you. -- 189.122.198.138 (talk) 03:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Information about origin edit
It would be good to verify those "origin stories" and see if there are any sources other than that one source that support the second one. Embuuzy (talk) 00:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. In fact, this statement: "The holiday was named "Singles' Day" because its date, 11/11 (November 11), consists of four "ones," representing four singles", sounds completely backwards. Isn't it more likely that the date was chosen in order to represent singles, and not the other way around? 76.102.93.221 (talk) 11:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Article Subject edit
This article is about the Chinese holiday of singles' day. If you would like to talk about an Indian holiday please consider creating a new article and cease to edit this one. Embuuzy (talk) 06:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)