Talk:Singapore Forum
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Xaiver0510 in topic Validity of "Self-Published Source(s)"
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Validity of "Self-Published Source(s)" edit
@Xaiver0510: This is a newly established international forum: in that PARTICULAR context, quoting their website ("self-published source") is perfectly fine. I am told a feature article mentioning them will be published later this week in a leading, peer-reviewed, European financial quarterly => Will link to that article as soon as I have it. Thanks for your help. B.Andersohn (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- As per on my talkpage, I tagged wrongly and should be tagged as primary source only and updated the tags. As mentioned, it will not passed AFC requirements of at least there reliable secondary sources.--Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)