This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support: Sources point to that name as the preferred spelling. Its also more succinct and grammatically correct. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I find the choice of the image misleading, since the liberation of Sinai was not done in 1973 as a part of the war, but in 1982 as a part of ther peace agreement. If the goal is to emphasize the occupation of Sinai, then Egyptians vehicles leaving Sinai toward Israel is definitely not a good choice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.117.190.138 (talk) 06:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes, this is agreed upon. The photo had a description which was out of context. As a result, a new image from Taba, which has seen significant events related to the Sinai liberation day, was added to the page and the description of the photo was fixed to describe the relationship between the photo and the article. The peace agreement discussion was added to the text of the main article. Amsguc (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
