This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Why is this particular brand of doll important enough to be in an encyclopedia? Nothing in the article seems noteworthy to me.--Gilabrand (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
And are you familiar with the topic, then, or just spouting off? Chris (talk) 08:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't know who you are and what you know, but I have every right to challenge unreference information, and if you call that smugness that's your problem.--Gilabrand (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
