Untitled edit

Uhhh, if I'm not wrong, isn't it "Shimla" instead of "Simla"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulveriser (talkcontribs)

Shimla is the new name of the town. When the treaty was signed, the town was called Simla. Shimla is infact as recent as the 1980s, if I am not wrong -- Lost 15:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Troops helds as prisoners of war? edit

This article says that 34,000 of those held by India as prisoners of war were military, while Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 says that 79,676 were uniformed (and over 50,000 were Army personel). Which number is right? Molinari 02:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

wikisource edit

The text of the agreement should be moved onto wikisource --PBS (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge to Simla Agreement DBigXray 11:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is another article (Simla agreement)about the same subject and having same title but different case. As Simla Agreement is a proper noun, this title follows the WP:TITLE guideline and therefore I propose merger of Simla agreement into this page. --SMS Talk 15:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

'Indo-Pakistani War' or 'Bangladesh Liberation War' edit

Most of the internal links listed under 'Indo-Pakistani War of 1971' are the war fraught between Mukti Bahini and West Pakistan army. Moreover these are happen before 3 December 1971, when India took part on war officially. I think it should changed to Bangladesh Liberation War.--Freemesm (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply