Talk:Simdesk/Archives/2016
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Mipmip in topic Untitled
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Untitled
Original research?
article deletion
Folks, if you want to keep this article, you will need to start writing up stuff and citing references. From my understanding of Simdesk, there *could* be an article written that passes WP:CORP. The article needs to keep a Neutral Point of View, but if the primary things that simcorp is known for are negative, then that's fine. There is no reason why this article should be a fluff piece. Wrs1864 01:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- As simdesk is mentioned in USA TODAY, in an article that does seem optimistic on Simdesk's possibilities, but is not a direct copy of a press release (I don't suppose that USA TODAY does journalism like that), it already passes the WP:CORP criteria for a product or company. Furthermore, the event that a city like Houston does the risky step of moving from MS Office to the unkown simdesk suite is rather notable. Therefore, this article should _not_ be deleted! Otherwise, where would people from Houston look to see what this simdesk stuff is all about? I think that the 'deletion' tag should be replaced by a 'stub' tag. Anyone who agrees/disagrees? -- Mipmip 06:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)