Talk:Silk Way Airlines

Edit war.

Please any atempt to change the current version of Incidents and Accidents will be considered Vandalism. We cant add more information until it become public. The current version is as neutral as posible.Mr.User200 (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

I now you meant someone else, but could you please try to be less bellicose ;-) It became public 2 July 2017 → Dilyana Gaytandzhieva: 350 diplomatic flights carry weapons for terrorists, Trud. --87.159.115.170 (talk) 01:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

False article

Dear Wikipedia, this article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silk_Way_Airlines&action=edit&section=5 ) appeared with a wrong information. And I would like to send you refutation. That you can read it and make your decisions.

https://report.az/en/foreign-politics/azerbaijani-fm-called-information-of-bulgarian-media-on-transportation-of-weapons-by-silk-way-unde/

Kamran013 (talk) 09:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

That doesn't refute anything. -Roxy, Zalophus californianus. barcus 09:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia,

How can I add new section in this page?

Kamran013 (talk) 08:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 8 February 2018

Dear Administration,

I want to remove the untrue article (Weapons for terrorists - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silk_Way_Airlines&action=edit&section=5) and i have the refutation to this text and all related links to that article. Kindly ask you to review this articles which i send you.

1) https://trud.bg/comments-by-the-embassy-of-the-republic-of-azerbaijan-with-regard-to-recent-publications-in-the-bulgarian-media/ - As you see the same newspaper TRUD published refutation to his first untrue article, after 5 days on 7 july 2017. The first article which is published with related links which contain untrue information is quite offensive and cause silk way big financial and representational damages. Please review this first untrue article - https://trud.bg/350-diplomatic-flights-carry-weapons-for-terrorists/ , which has been published on 2 july 2017. And remove/delete this information from Silk Way Airlines Wikipedia page.

2) http://sofia.mfa.gov.az/news/151/3094 Airlines13 (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your references do not refute anything. No 1, is just a statement from an embassy official which tells us nothing, a comment on exactly the same statement referred to in the section above. No 2 is blank. I will leave the template at "no" to allow other editors to be made aware of the request. a discussion was held at ANI here entitled "Silk Way Airlines" which informs. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 18:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Dear Administration,

Can i create new section and put this statement from an embassy official to Silk Way Airlines Wikipedia page? It is reply to first article - https://trud.bg/comments-by-the-embassy-of-the-republic-of-azerbaijan-with-regard-to-recent-publications-in-the-bulgarian-media/Airlines13 (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Dear Administration,

Can you answer to my question above.

Airlines13 (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by the Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan with regard to recent publications in the Bulgarian media (newspaper TRUD)

The Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan informs that the IT resources of the Embassy have been subject to hacker attacks. This incident is recent in a series of cyberattacks against the Republic of Azerbaijan, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its online resources.

The relevant authorities of the Republic of Azerbaijan are investigating this hack. Media outlets that are replicating groundless allegations with regard to this hacker attack as well as timing of this incident are of no coincidence and may indicate the origins of and masterminds behind this attack against the Republic of Azerbaijan.

This hacker attack once again revealed the urgency of co-operation between States, international organisations and private industry in combating cybercrime, including by investigating and prosecuting such criminal offences at both domestic and international levels. We expect that the Republic of Bulgaria as a host country and whose internet provider services have been used by the Embassy of Azerbaijan, will fully cooperate to this end.

With regard to press allegations on operations of the Silk Way airline of Azerbaijan, the Embassy resolutely rejects these speculations as baseless. The Silk Way airline is the leading freight logistics provider of Azerbaijan, which gained international reputation for its reliable, efficient and transparent operations worldwide in full compliance with relevant IATA/ICAO regulations.

It is a well established international practice that air carriers of dangerous cargofollow arms control regimes and relevant IATA/ICAO regulations and diplomatic clearance by consignor and consignee countries as well as countries along the air route is obtained and detailed information on relevant cargo is provided through diplomatic channels.<ref>

Protected edit request on 7 February 2018

Dear Administration,

Can i create new section and put this article from an embassy official to Silk Way Airlines Wikipedia page?

Topic is: Comments by the Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan with regard to recent publications in the Bulgarian media

http://sofia.mfa.gov.az/en/news/151/3094

https://trud.bg/comments-by-the-embassy-of-the-republic-of-azerbaijan-with-regard-to-recent-publications-in-the-bulgarian-media/ Airlines13 (talk) 10:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done This page is not protected, an edit request is not needed. Feel free to continue to discuss content. — xaosflux ^Talk 20:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Section: Cargo and munitions transportation

@Jim1138: Hi Jim, 'we' meaning 'myself and a fellow analyst and colleague who have been following the industry at a global scale'RazorAustin933 (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)".

I would suggest the terminology is subjective and the link we added refutes the statement on shipping operations.

@Jim1138: I believe the titles are subjective and misinformed and the link refuting the findings of the article in nature is credible. In the interest of clarity, wish to convey this.RazorAustin933 (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

I seriously doubt that the CAPA refutes the allegations. There are six sources supporting Silk Way's transporting arms and munitions illegally. CAPA's blanket denial without specifics nor sources is rather useless. Given the number of people and groups making the allegations, it seems rather silly.

What is the original source of your content in Bulgarian?

Would you mind mentioning who your fellow colleagues work for? If you are paid for this, you need to disclose it per wp:PAID Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jim1138: To clarify, I'm suggesting the response given by the link I provided should rebuke the paragraph (which I believe to be less than neutral in tone) regarding the nature of transport. Not requesting omission of the copy above. Understood re: payments and would disclose if were applicable here.RazorAustin933 (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

How does it rebuke? It is a blanket statement without sources nor references? Again read wp:NPOV as the large number of sources support this, why should the section title be changed? Pinging other involved editor: @LightandDark2000: Jim1138 (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

I really don't think that the section title should be changed at this time. The new titles that I've seen were also either too general or inaccurately described the content of the section. LightandDark2000 (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)