Talk:Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Colombia High‑importance

	Colombia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

as stated at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Sierrasantamarta.jpg

Access problems edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I think that the knowledge of these is general enough for them not to need citation. If it is not, then loads of material on Wikipedia would need similar citation. I propose to revert the "citation needed" tag unless there is any objection. Viewfinder 02:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Them? who are them? W:NPOV, prove that the information there is true, how do I know whoever wrote that isn't making it up just for the sake? general enough? what happened to neutrality? --F3rn4nd0 05:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added a citation. I have the specific information about the north and south access problems from the same author, but I do not know if he has published this detail, so if you insist on deleting it then I probably cannot stop you. But I think that such a deletion would be unnecessary. The attitude of the local tribes and the problems of the drug conflict are well known. Viewfinder 06:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Currently, Pico Simón Bolívar is a microstub, and contradicts Pico Cristóbal Colón. Should it be merged into here? Should the two peaks be merged into one article instead? Should both peaks be merged into here? -- Spireguy 22:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think so. I see no need for separate articles. Viewfinder 20:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree, there is little info about the peak, not even a picture to actually describe it.. --F3rn4nd0 ^{(Roger - Out)} 17:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree too. It'd be a good idea, at least, until there's enough info for the other two articles to become sufficient on their own. --Fbolanos (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Several peaks in the Sierra Nevada are intervisible with Cerro Paramillo edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Very nice mention of the theoretical longest visible distance between two points of the earth surface! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.67.176.167 (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic