Talk:Siegfried Huneck

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siegfried Huneck/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 07:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Okay, pretty solid article overall, but I have a few comments. Suggestions for rewording are optional, while those based on MOS should generally be implemented.
• The lead shouldn't have any citations, especially since all the info seem to already be cited in the body.

• Removed citation. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• 9 September 1928 – 9 October 2011 → 9 September, 1928 – 9 October, 2011 per MOS:DATECOMMA

• Not quite; as explained in the link, that comma style only applies to month–day–year format. The applicable policy here is MOS:BIRTHDATE. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• All the German words and phrases in the article need lang templates.

• Added lang templates to phrases and titles. I don't think it's needed for individual words that use the same characters as English. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• "primary school here" → "primary school there"

• Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• "delay because of" → "delay caused by"

• Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• "study chemistry University of Jena" → "study chemistry at the University of Jena"

• Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• "time, so no" → "time and so no"

• Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• "on the chemistry of amino-derivatives of pentacyclic triterpenes" → "on the chemistry of amino-derivatives of pentacyclic triterpenes"

• Triterpene was linked previously, but linked the other. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Liverwort is duplinked.

• Fixed. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• "retirement, in 1995 Huneck" → "retirement, in 1995, Huneck"

• Comma moved. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Are the binominal authorities for the species named after him necessary? They don't seem particularly relevant.

• Perhaps not to everyone, but they instantly answer the question "who named species after this person?" without having to click further. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Perhaps add a photo of one of the species named after him, as otherwise the article entirely lacks images.

• Couldn't find any free images of these species for use (Opegrapha huneckii doesn't really count as it's a junior synonym). However, I did add a fair-use image of him. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• On what basis were the publications mentioned chosen?

• My criteria were sort of a combination of "not too short", "representative of his life work", "has been discussed/mentioned as an important work of his in his obituary", but I'm open to suggestions for adding/removing. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Refs are consistently formatted and reliable.
• A couple searches of random phrases from teh article turned up nothing except for Wikipedia and mirrors, so copyvio seems good. AryKun (talk) 10:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for reviewing, AryKun. Here's a diff of the changes made. Esculenta (talk)

• Okay, passes the criteria now. AryKun (talk) 06:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)