Talk:Siege of Krujë (1450)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Gaius Claudius Nero in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WikiCopter (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Change motivation in the lead to a more indisputable word or add a citation. WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 19:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
How about "Skanderbeg's exhortations?"--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 16:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Checkup on the last two sentences of the last section. If possible, change the youtube link to a published source. Add a source to the last sentence. If you have none, use the book itself. WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 03:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure where to get a published source for the scene, but I will put in the movie which it is taken from. I s it fine if I keep the video link in there?--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 16:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Good for GA, although leans slightly toward the Albanians. You might have some trouble there at FAC. WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 03:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Good work, Gaius. WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 01:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
How are the fixes?--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Excellent
Thanks for taking the time to review this article!--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 01:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply