Talk:Siege of Constantinople (674–678)/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 16:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I'll get to this later this weekend.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Nicely done. BTW, I once took a class on military strategists from Walter Kaegi.
- Pass or Fail:
- Thanks for taking the time! I've added the missing publisher locations, but is there really nothing more? Wetman made some comments about "historicity" in the talk page, but I couldn't exactly catch his drift. Whatever criticism or suggestions you have, please make them, no matter how minor. PS, I like Kaegi a lot, his analysis is always insightful and concise, but judging from his book on Heraclius, he can get very repetitive when going for detailed description. I don't know about your experience with him, but I think I'd enjoy having a class under him. Constantine ✍ 18:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting guy, but better in person than in the classroom. That was a long time ago, so he's probably retired from active teaching by now. I don't really understand Wetman's issues either, but I found the article pretty complete. To be fair I know a little bit about the Byzantines, so I may not be the best person to catch places that might be lacking, but again, I thought you did a good job summarizing what the chroniclers said and trying to reconcile their accounts.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time! I've added the missing publisher locations, but is there really nothing more? Wetman made some comments about "historicity" in the talk page, but I couldn't exactly catch his drift. Whatever criticism or suggestions you have, please make them, no matter how minor. PS, I like Kaegi a lot, his analysis is always insightful and concise, but judging from his book on Heraclius, he can get very repetitive when going for detailed description. I don't know about your experience with him, but I think I'd enjoy having a class under him. Constantine ✍ 18:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)