Talk:Siege of Berwick (1318)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Scotland may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Capture of Berwick
editBerwick changed hands several times in the Middle Ages, so why is this the most important? I suggest moving it to its date. PatGallacher (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Capture of Berwick (1318). Favonian (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Capture of Berwick → Capture of Berwick (1318) – Berwick changed hands around a dozen times in the middle ages, it is far from obvious that this is much more important than the others. If anything, I think the 1296 capture could be better known, as the first important action in the Wars of Scottish Independence. Capture of Berwick should be a disambiguation page. PatGallacher (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support a set index should be instituted. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Happy to see Capture of Berwick become a dab page or set index, with a bunch of redlinks, encouraging future growth... bobrayner (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.