Talk:Siege of Berat (1280–1281)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cplakidas in topic As for the infobox
 | Siege of Berat (1280–1281) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 6, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the defeat of his army in the Siege of Berat ended Charles of Anjou's designs to invade the Byzantine Empire over land? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Siege of Berat (1280–1281)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Magic♪piano 00:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
First paragraph is not cited.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This is a well-written, informative article. I made a minor clarification to the mention of Sicilian Vespers, which not everyone will recognized as some sort of uprising. The sources (as best I can verify) check out, and the images are properly licensed, although the lead map could use an {{Information}} template, properly filled out.
The only issue is that the first paragraph of the background is uncited. I imagine this will not be hard to fix; nomination is on hold. Magic♪piano 13:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review this! I added the requested citations, and tweaked the paragraph around a little. Any further issues? Constantine ✍ 12:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
As for the infobox edit
In the belligerents section it says "Kingdom of Sicily" rather than Angevin Kingdom of Albania. The battle occurred in the Angevin territories of Albania not Sicily. Also the leader of the army in the battle, Hugo De Sully was Vicar-General of the Albanian Kingdom since 1279. So I propose to change it if nobody objects. Euripides ψ (talk) 21:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Erm, their naming as a kingdom aside, the Angevin territories in Albania were nothing other than a province of the Angevin Kingdom of Sicily. There was no Angevin Albania independent of the Italian kingdom. It is like claiming that the Ottoman invasion of the Peloponnese in 1715 was against the Kingdom of the Morea, but not the Republic of Venice. Constantine ✍ 09:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)