This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago9 comments2 people in discussion
@OrionNimrod, the context regarding the outcome and the strength of the battle is not covered by the article body. Please include those and edit the infobox. Please consider reading the edit summary at least. Ajayraj890 (talk) 07:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Ajayraj890, I added porper sources. [1] I do no know where do you get this siege was "stalemate". The attackers did not occupied the castle and they did not move back to home after a "friendly camping" OrionNimrod (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
You should cover it on article body. Can you add those 'strength' parameters on the article body too? Ajayraj890 (talk) 03:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, you can see I started to add sourced contents to the article, indeed this article was at very raw level. (Still I do not know how did you figure out the “stalemate”) OrionNimrod (talk) 08:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I put stalemate because nowhere in the article mentions the result of the event. Also, cover the article body with the context in the infobox. Ajayraj890 (talk) 09:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
You should ask “citation needed” or ask support for article extension to write in the related wikiprojects (Hungarian, Turkish, Serb…) not to invent unsourced new stories, because this is history falsification.
You can see I added already some text about the outcome in the lead and quote below, but of course this article is quite poor at the moment. OrionNimrod (talk) 10:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Then expand it. How am I supposed to know while the infobox doesn't deflect the information as of the article body? Ajayraj890 (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
“Stalemate” was also not in the article body. OrionNimrod (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I put that because there was no result. Especially for the siege, after reading the article body, I prefer to not leave a blank space on result parameter Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
